WSM 400 Eiger King Quad 2002-2018 Piston Kit - 50-402-06k - .75mm OVER SIZE

WSM 400 Eiger King Quad 2002-2018 Piston Kit - 50-402-06k - .75mm OVER SIZE

Marsoni

M251S

$110.97

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

WSM 400 Eiger King Quad 2002-2018 Piston Kit - 50-402-06k - .75mm OVER SIZEWSM 400 Eiger King Quad 2002 2018 Piston Kit . 75mm OVER SIZE ONLY Brand : WSM OEM #: 12111 38F21 0F0 Fits the following: Make Model CC HP Year Suzuki Eiger 400 2002 Suzuki Eiger 400 2002 2007 Suzuki Eiger 400 2003 Suzuki Eiger 400 2004 Suzuki Eiger 400 2005 Suzuki Eiger 400 2006 Suzuki Eiger 400 2007 Suzuki King Quad 400 2008 Suzuki King Quad 400 2008 2018 Suzuki King Quad 400 2009 Suzuki King Quad 400 2010 Suzuki King Quad 400 2011 Suzuki King Quad

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your WSM 400 Eiger King Quad 2002-2018 Piston Kit - 50-402-06k - .75mm OVER SIZE orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your WSM 400 Eiger King Quad 2002-2018 Piston Kit - 50-402-06k - .75mm OVER SIZE ships.

Need Help?
Questions about WSM 400 Eiger King Quad 2002-2018 Piston Kit - 50-402-06k - .75mm OVER SIZE, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for WSM 400 Eiger King Quad 2002-2018 Piston Kit - 50-402-06k - .75mm OVER SIZE in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

The shoes came with the correct size and is a good fit. They were originally pretty stiff, but are much better now after breaking them in. They look good. but as other's have said, they are made of synthetic leather and in my opinion have kind of a plastic look to them. The quality is good with ridged rubbber soles. I thought they were kind of expensive, but then again I haven't purchased these type of shoes in a while. A family member told me that if they were real leather, they would have been a lot more expensive. For what the shoes are I would recommend the purchase.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on February 11, 2025

Verified Purchase

Mar Ronquillo

Dallas, US

★★★★★ 3

I wanted to love these

Size: 9, Color: Black Leather

These are very good looking in person, especially the buckles and the pop of red on black. Alas, I have another pair of Marc Joseph shoes to compare comfort and fit, and this pair simply hurts my feet.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026

Verified Purchase

Wei

Boise, US

★★★★★ 5

Fitness

Size: 9, Color: Black Leather

Comfortable

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2026

Verified Purchase

K 8bro

Belleville, US

★★★★★ 4

Fit over a rather large bunion!

Size: 13 Wide, Color: Mocha Grainy Leather

Very comfortable…didn’t pinch toe bed. Attractive!

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2026

Verified Purchase

Richard H.

Carnegie, US

★★★★★ 1

These shoes ARE NOT LEATHER as advertised!

Size: 14, Color: Black

I own 4 pair of Marc Joseph shoes. All were Amazon advertised as Leather uppers and received as such. Made in Brazil out of real leather. Good quality shoes and a fair price. My recent purchases of 2 pair of Marc Jospeh shoes are Amazon advertised as" Leather Uppers". They are NOT leather and I sent them back to Amazon. Made in China. To me this is a bait and switch. Product descriptions should be honest and complete and reveal origin. My previous purchases stated "Made in Brazil" and "Leather Uppers." Since they were Marc Joseph, I thought these 2 recent pair were creditably described so I ordered based on my prior satisfied experience. Shame on me. Marc Joseph has lost a loyal customer.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 30, 2025