Exedy 1993-1998 Toyota Supra Twin Turbo L6 Hyper Triple Cerametallic Clutch Rigid Disc Pull Type

Exedy 1993-1998 Toyota Supra Twin Turbo L6 Hyper Triple Cerametallic Clutch Rigid Disc Pull Type

Marsoni

M251S

$1521.19

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Exedy 1993-1998 Toyota Supra Twin Turbo L6 Hyper Triple Cerametallic Clutch Rigid Disc Pull TypeFor high powered applications, EXEDY offers twin and triple Multi Plate clutches. These are designed for high power street action as well as drag, road and rally racing. The twin plate clutches are rated for approximately 500 ft lbs of torque and the triple plates are rated for approximately 800 ft lbs of torque, both figures at the flywheel. Twins come with both spring damper discs or solid discs depending on application, whereas triples are all

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Exedy 1993-1998 Toyota Supra Twin Turbo L6 Hyper Triple Cerametallic Clutch Rigid Disc Pull Type orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Exedy 1993-1998 Toyota Supra Twin Turbo L6 Hyper Triple Cerametallic Clutch Rigid Disc Pull Type ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Exedy 1993-1998 Toyota Supra Twin Turbo L6 Hyper Triple Cerametallic Clutch Rigid Disc Pull Type, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Exedy 1993-1998 Toyota Supra Twin Turbo L6 Hyper Triple Cerametallic Clutch Rigid Disc Pull Type in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I have several portable tungsten work lights on stands. They product a high level of light which is great for work in a place without adequate lighting. I can move the lights around and get the best lighting. The problem is that they have short cords. This wire, the 16AWG (with the addition of a plug and a receptacle) will solve that problem. The outer jacket is rugged enough to handle daily use and it is light enough that it is not a bother to carry several to the work site. With a rating of 13.1 amps it maybe a little light to use as a replacement cord for power tools, but this wire does come in several other sizes including 14AWG which should work on most tools.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 18, 2022

W. B. Smith

Charlottesville, US

★★★★★ 5

nice 3 strand 16 gauge wire

Size: 20FT, Style: 16AWG-3C, Size: 20FT, Style: 16AWG-3C

This review is for a 20 foot sample of 3 stranded 16 gauge wire. 300V capacity. Using a multimeter, I got a resistance reading of 0.2 ohms across each of the three strands (at roughly 68 degrees Farenheit). Specs say 26 strands of 0.254 mm Tinned copper wire are inside each cable. Good flexibility in the covering.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 18, 2022

Tosh

Bozeman, US

★★★★★ 5

Just what was needed

Size: 20FT, Style: 16AWG-3C

This worked great to extend an electrical line a short distance further than the one that was attached to it. No issues encountered.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 19, 2022

Verified Purchase

Roberto

Whiting, US

★★★★★ 3

Work good

Size: 20FT, Style: 16AWG-3C

Se mira más delgado que 16 gauge

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2024

Bob Nohome

Phoenix, US

★★★★★ 3

Good quality but no more flexible than average cords.

Size: 10FT, Style: 16AWG-3C

The internal wires are good quality with a decent number of strands, but the outer cover is standard pvc, tough but no more flexible than any other cord product. Not suitable for my use on a hand power tool, a rubber cover is better.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 15, 2022